100%

Expand all

Chapter

Investment

Report

GIC’s mandate is to preserve and enhance the international purchasing power of the reserves placed under our management by delivering good long-term returns above global inflation.

Highlights

2.1 Overview: Long-term Investment Performance

Annualised Rolling 20-year Real Rate of Return of the GIC Portfolio Since 2001

3.9

%

Over 20 years up to 31 March 2024, the GIC Portfolio’s annualised US$ nominal and real (above global inflation) returns were 5.8% and 3.9% respectively per year.

2.5 INVESTMENT OUTLOOK

Investing in a World of Uncertainty

The global investment environment remains challenging despite recent macroeconomic resilience. Return prospects are more divergent across markets and within asset classes. The current environment underscores the importance of active (alpha) over broad market (beta) performance in the overall delivery of returns.

Read Chapter 2

2.1 Overview: Long-term Investment Performance

GIC’s mandate is to preserve and enhance the international purchasing power of the reserves under our management over the long term. The primary metric for evaluating GIC’s investment performance is the annualised rolling 20-year real rate of return.

For the 20-year period from 1 April 2004 to 31 March 2024, the annualised US$ nominal return of our portfolio was 5.8%. After adjusting for global inflation, the annualised 20-year real return was 3.9%, 0.7 percentage points lower than last year (see Box 1 for more detail on the mechanics behind the calculation of the rolling 20-year return).

Figure 1. Annualised Rolling 20-Year Real Rate of Return of the GIC Portfolio Since 2001

Hover to view stats

Understanding the Mechanics of the Annualised Rolling 20-Year Return (Box 1)

GIC reports our performance as an annualised 20-year real return, which is the average time-weighted portfolio return over that period. A time-weighted return measures the fund manager’s ability to generate returns as it removes the impact of cashflows into or out of the portfolio and directly attributes the performance to the investment decisions made by the portfolio manager.

The return figure is a rolling return, which means that last year’s reported 20-year return spanned the period 1 April 2003 to 31 March 2023, while this year’s 20-year return spans 1 April 2004 to 31 March 2024, and next year’s return will span 1 April 2005 to 31 March 2025. For each new year added, the earliest year is dropped out of the measurement window. The change in this rolling return figure is therefore determined by the return from the earliest year that drops out and the latest year that is added. For example, for this year’s 20-year return, the strong returns from 1 April 2003 to 31 March 2004 dropped out of the rolling window – in that year, equity markets staged a strong recovery from the sharp correction following the dot-com crisis.

Even though the rolling 20-year real rate of return is intended to measure returns over the long term, it can still reflect a significant cyclical element. This is particularly evident when the cycles are very pronounced at the start or end of the 20-year window. For example, a 20-year period from 1999 to 2018 would include both the sharp rise in valuations resulting from the dot-com boom in 1999 and 2000, and the subsequent bust between 2001 and 2003, whilst a 20-year period from 2001 to 2020 would be negatively affected by the large decline in asset prices from the dot-com bust and multiple years of negative returns spanning 2001 to 2003.

Diagram 1. Illustration of a Portfolio’s Rolling 20-Year Return

20-Year Return

2002

2003

2004

2005

2021

2022

2023

2024

Over the long term, the GIC Portfolio’s performance is largely driven by the dynamics of the global economy, our asset allocation strategy, and skill-based strategies undertaken by our active strategy investment teams that seek to add returns above market benchmarks. In total, we strive to achieve good and sustainable long-term returns for the GIC Portfolio across a broad range of economic scenarios, within the risk parameters set by our Client, the Government of Singapore. This is described in more detail in the chapter ‘Managing the Portfolio’.

2.2 Investment Backdrop

In 2023, the global economy was resilient despite a sharp tightening in global monetary policy in 2022. Inflation slowed during the year, driving strong performance in global risk assets as markets priced in the prospect of central banks exiting from tight monetary policy. Increased enthusiasm around generative artificial intelligence (AI) also boosted returns in the technology sector, primarily in US markets.

Heightened geopolitical risks persisted as the Russia-Ukraine war continued from 2022. The outbreak of the Middle East conflict in October 2023 added to them. The resulting spectre of commodity and supply chain disruptions increases the risks of resurgent inflation and lower growth.

In the ongoing environment of diverging asset class valuations, macro uncertainty, and heightened geopolitical risks, we continue to emphasise portfolio resilience. We continue to prepare for multiple scenarios, maintain diversification and price discipline, while staying alert to investment opportunities that may arise.

2.3 The GIC Portfolio

In the year ending March 2024, the share of nominal bonds and cash fell, while that of inflation-linked bonds rose, supporting the portfolio’s resilience to inflation. In addition, the share of private equity in our portfolio increased due to continued deployment of capital and strong returns.

Table 1. Asset Mix of the GIC Portfolio

Asset Mix

31 March 2024 (%)

31 March 2023 (%)

Developed Market Equities

13

13

Emerging Market Equities

17

17

Nominal Bonds and Cash

32

34

Inflation-Linked Bonds

7

6

Real Estate

13

13

Private Equity

18

17

Total

100

100

The geographical distribution of the GIC Portfolio as at 31 March 2024 is set out in Figure 2 below. It reflects the results of our asset allocation strategy and bottom-up opportunities sourced by our investment teams worldwide. While we do not allocate our assets by geography, we monitor our exposures across regions.

Figure 2. Geographic Mix of the GIC Portfolio as at 31 March 2024

22% Asia ex Japan 4% Japan 10% Eurozone 5% United Kingdom 11% Global 5% Middle East,Africa, and the rest of Europe 4% Latin America 39% United States

Hover to view stats

2.4 Intermediate Markers of Investment Performance

While the primary metric for tracking the GIC Portfolio’s investment performance is the rolling 20-year return above global inflation, we also monitor our ongoing intermediate investment performance. Table 2 shows the nominal (i.e. not adjusted for inflation) US$ returns over 10 years and five years and the corresponding portfolio volatility. We include 20-year nominal numbers for completeness here.

Table 2. Nominal Annualised Return and Volatility of the GIC Portfolio (in US$, for periods ending 31 March 2024)

GIC Portfolio

Time Period

Nominal Return

Volatility

20-Year

5.8%

8.7%

10-Year

4.6%

7.1%

5-Year

4.4%

8.0%

Over the 20-, 10-, and 5-year periods, the GIC Portfolio returned 5.8%, 4.6%, and 4.4% in nominal US$ terms respectively. This was reflective of market challenges in recent years that featured sharp falls in returns in fixed income and global equities, particularly in emerging markets. The GIC Portfolio was likewise impacted. Going forward, the environment of compressed risk premia in certain key asset classes, against a backdrop of heightened macroeconomic and geopolitical uncertainty, is likely to continue to weigh on returns. On a total portfolio basis, GIC adopts a conservative strategy and had reduced risk-taking before 2020 in areas that we assessed to be overvalued. We remained cautious in FY2023/24.

We also monitor the performance of a Reference Portfolio which comprises 65% global equities and 35% global bonds. The Reference Portfolio is not a performance benchmark for the GIC Portfolio but represents the risk the Client is prepared for GIC to take in generating good long-term investment returns. On occasions when we are more risk-averse than the risk profile of the Reference Portfolio, such as when market exuberance leads to heightened valuations, we may lower our risk exposure. Conversely, we may increase our risk exposure when the opportunity arises. This is part of a disciplined approach to long-term value investing.

Table 3 shows the nominal US$ returns over 20-, 10-, and 5-year periods and the corresponding volatility for the Reference Portfolio which acts as a risk reference for the GIC Portfolio. Over all three time periods, and particularly over the last five years, the GIC Portfolio had lower volatility than the Reference Portfolio. This was due to our diversified asset composition and preemptive measures to lower portfolio risk in recent years, including an underweight in Developed Market Equities. As a result, over the 5-, 10- and 20-year horizons, the GIC Portfolio had lower returns as Developed Market Equities performed strongly during these periods.

Table 3. Nominal Annualised Return and Volatility of the Reference Portfolio (in US$, for periods ending 31 March 2024)

Reference Portfolio

Time Period

Nominal Return

Volatility

20-Year

6.4%

11.3%

10-Year

6.0%

10.8%

5-Year

7.0%

13.2%

2.5 Investment Outlook

Despite recent macroeconomic resilience, the global investment environment remains challenging, due to a combination of factors. These include monetary policy settings in the US that may stay tight for longer, macroeconomic challenges in China related to its property market, and continued heightened geopolitical tensions. Moreover, medium-term return prospects remain low, and risk-reward less favourable, given elevated valuations across many risk assets, particularly in developed markets. The prevailing uncertainty underscores the importance of humility in forecasting and reiterates our belief in preparing, not predicting.

The resilience of the global economy has reduced the near-term likelihood of a recession. However, the greater resilience may slow down the disinflation process, which is showing up in elevated rates of inflation in the services sector (see Figure 3). Major central banks that were slated to cut rates this year have either done less than expected or postponed their plans. The key reason is to keep growth below potential and inflation in check as the probability of a recession is reduced.

The challenge for investors is that several key markets are pricing in a very positive outcome as they expect a high growth rate at this point of the cycle. Credit spreads in the US and Europe, in particular, are below or close to their lowest quartile in the past decade. However, there is a wide dispersion across markets and within asset classes. Even as broad markets are challenged, good investment opportunities remain available across markets. This dispersion favours a more bottom-up approach, alongside more nimble capital allocation across different opportunities. This year’s feature article highlights some of our improved capabilities.

Figure 3. Services Inflation Remains Elevated

Euro Area

US

UK

Source: MacroBond Financial, GIC Calculations

Hover to view stats

There are risks to the outlook. If inflation proves more persistent than expected and even increases, core central banks may not only have to keep rates higher for longer but potentially raise them. This would increase recession risks and put strains on households and businesses already struggling with high borrowing costs. Another risk is a more abrupt slowdown in China if there is a further downturn in the property market. Finally, geopolitical risks are rising. Broader unrest in the Middle East, for example, could hamper growth and raise inflation through oil supply and trade disruptions. On the upside, faster adoption and productive use cases of AI could generate higher productivity growth than anticipated.

Beyond the medium term, there are secular forces at play that have implications for the investment environment, as touched on in previous GIC Reports. Inflation and interest rates are expected to settle at higher levels than in the post-Global Financial Crisis and pre-COVID periods (i.e. higher for longer). This is driven by some of the other secular factors discussed in Box 2 below. Reduced appetite for globalisation and structurally higher geopolitical tensions will weigh on productivity, add to inflation, and raise uncertainty, posing headwinds to global growth and complicating the investment environment. Climate change and decarbonisation will impose higher economic costs due, respectively, to physical damage to assets and the green transition. However, the impact on growth from this will be partly countered by increased investment needs and opportunities. Finally, AI offers the prospect of increased productivity, but not all economies and companies are equally prepared to take advantage of it. The adoption of AI also comes with societal risks that governments must proactively manage.

These forces are driving our efforts to build a resilient and agile portfolio to guard against risks in a more uncertain investment environment, while proactively pursuing new opportunities.

Secular Forces Shaping the Investment Environment (Box 2)

Beyond cyclical developments, the investment environment is shaped by ongoing structural changes that will persist over the longer term. These will continue to drive investments in specific sectors. As discussed in last year’s report, inflation is likely to prove more persistent over the longer term. This reflects:

  • Shrinking labour supply and lower savings due to aging;

  • Less efficient use of labour and capital due to slower and changing globalisation; and

  • Rising cost and demand-led inflation associated with the green transition.

Interest rates are also expected to remain higher than pre-COVID, which can put pressure on highly indebted governments, companies, and households, especially for those where debt service obligations are already challenging.

Persistently higher geopolitical tensions, the uneven distribution of the gains from globalisation, and rising populism have contributed to increased scepticism toward multilateralism and a shift toward inward-looking policies. There have also been more armed conflicts. This could lead to policy-driven global geopolitical and economic fragmentation. The impact is higher uncertainty and inflation, and reduced productivity due to the associated less efficient allocation of labour and capital resources. There will be both losers and winners, with certain countries and sectors benefitting from the reorganisation of the global supply chain along geopolitical lines.

Climate change is already with us. The risk is that it will get worse, especially if countries fall behind on their climate commitments. At the current pace of decarbonisation, the economic damage from climate change is expected to reach 11-29% of global GDP, or US$19-59 trillion by 2050. This includes impacts on macroeconomic output, labour, and agricultural productivity. This figure is likely an underestimation as it excludes damages from sea-level rise, tipping points, and non-market damages which are difficult to model due to their lack of precedent. This implies a significant need to invest more in energy and climate change adaptation across countries, businesses, and households to become more climate change prepared, over and above the investments required for a successful green transition.

The adoption of AI has the potential to boost productivity. This is driven by:

  • Increasing automation;

  • Generating predictive analytics faster;

  • Streamlining workflows and optimising operations; and

  • Enhancing and expediting decision-making.

However, the pace of adoption, AI’s self-improvement, and regulation will be important factors, making it difficult to quantify the productivity lift. On the flip side, AI will also cause labour displacement, with advanced economies most exposed. However, these same economies are much better prepared to utilise AI’s potential, cushioning against some of the adverse labour market implications. Nevertheless, there is divergence across advanced and emerging economies as well as companies in terms of AI preparedness (see Figures 4 and 5).

Figure 4. AI Exposure versus Preparedness

By Analytical Group

By Country

Low Income Countries (LICs)

Emerging Market Economies (EMs)

Advanced Economies (AEs)

Source: International Monetary Fund

Hover to view stats

Figure 5. AI Preparedness by Component

Digital Infrastructure

Human Capital & Policies

Innovation & Integration

Regulation & Ethics

Source: International Monetary Fund

Hover to view stats

We expect to see continued uncertainty as these secular trends unfold. We will stay anchored in our mandate, values, and investing principles, by being focused on: value, emphasising diversification, a long-term approach, building optionality, pursuing bottom-up opportunities, and adding value to our investments.

  1. 1

    A nominal 20-year return of 5.8% in USD terms means that US$1 million invested with GIC in 2004 would have grown to approximately US$3.1 million today.

  2. 2

    A time-weighted return measures the total rate of return over a specific time period by compounding the returns across multiple subperiods.

  3. 3

    GIC’s primary performance measurement metric is the rolling 20-year real rate of return, which we described earlier in this chapter.

  4. 4

    The GIC Portfolio rates of return are computed on a time-weighted basis, net of costs and fees incurred in the management of the portfolio.

  5. 5

    Volatility is computed using the standard deviation of the monthly returns of the GIC Portfolio over the specified time horizon.

  6. 6

    The Reference Portfolio was adopted from 1 April 2013 and reflects the risk that the Government is prepared for GIC to take in its long-term investment strategies. It comprises 65% global equities and 35% global bonds. For more details, please refer to the chapter ‘Managing the Portfolio’.

  7. 7

    The Reference Portfolio rates of return are provided on a gross basis, i.e. without adjustment for costs and fees.

  8. 8

    Volatility is computed using the standard deviation of the monthly returns of the Reference Portfolio over the specified time horizon.

  9. 9

    Maximilian Kotz, Anders Levermann, and Leonie Wenz (2024). The Economic Commitment of Climate Change, Nature 628.

  10. 10

    The AI Preparedness Index is compiled by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) based on four aggregate dimensions. The index is computed for 32 advanced economies, 56 emerging market economies, and 37 low-income countries. The length of the bar indicates AI preparedness. Country names use International Organization for Standardization (ISO) country codes.